The Father is God But if the presence of the father and then of the Father in the 'I' is a space the birth of the 'I' itself, then how to get out?
"Ivan - as Raskòl'ikov etc.. - Continue to reflect on the meaning of that his theoretical discovery, 'if God does not exist then everything is permitted', and it hypnotizes. That phrase is an immediate consequence of the desire for patricide: the father if there was more to tie my 'me', then all that my 'I' I may be allowed: and the earthly father to the divine, that sentence can of course go all the major intermediate in a growing revolutionary if there were no spiritual authority, then all would be allowed if there was Tsar then everything would be permitted, and so on. " (Ibid., pag.XXVIII).
In Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky describes the story of a man who believes he can break the law of human respect, confusing freedom with arbitrariness. Demons In depicting the same story, but the protagonist of the crime, he would meet his punishment, is no longer a single man but a sect of conspirators. The philosophy of "anything goes", which is that of Raskolnikov in Crime and Punishment, Demons became the revolutionary theory according to which there are no barriers of good and evil in action policy. In both cases there is no justification for Dostoevsky the use of violence and murder. The personality of man, any man, even the most miserable, like the filthy usurer of Crime and Punishment, is something sacred and absolute that it is wrong to use as a means or instrument, but you must respect and value as an end in itself . Both Raskolnikov Stavrogin
that have broken the current morality. But Raskolnikov believes he has discovered a theoretical truth and fight to win his freedom, even if illusory, is a researcher. Stavrogin rather not look for nothing, believes in nothing, has great intellectual ability but do not have a moral sense.
Through the characters of the two novels mentioned here, Dostoevsky wants to persuade us that the liberal world is a world weary, unable to see the consequences of its ideological positions.
"The character of 'demonic' is to push and trample the man against his will, depriving them of freedom and availability of interior, severing the bonds of human participation with others. This demonic that denies God, freedom and personality, mental illness is more than a political phenomenon. The "demonic" and "obsession" are forces that paralyze the personality, the sense of freedom and atrophy contract consciousness. " [1]
[1] Dostoevsky (1870), The demons, the introduction of Remo Cantoni, Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, Milan, 1987, pag.X.
"Ivan - as Raskòl'ikov etc.. - Continue to reflect on the meaning of that his theoretical discovery, 'if God does not exist then everything is permitted', and it hypnotizes. That phrase is an immediate consequence of the desire for patricide: the father if there was more to tie my 'me', then all that my 'I' I may be allowed: and the earthly father to the divine, that sentence can of course go all the major intermediate in a growing revolutionary if there were no spiritual authority, then all would be allowed if there was Tsar then everything would be permitted, and so on. " (Ibid., pag.XXVIII).
In Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky describes the story of a man who believes he can break the law of human respect, confusing freedom with arbitrariness. Demons In depicting the same story, but the protagonist of the crime, he would meet his punishment, is no longer a single man but a sect of conspirators. The philosophy of "anything goes", which is that of Raskolnikov in Crime and Punishment, Demons became the revolutionary theory according to which there are no barriers of good and evil in action policy. In both cases there is no justification for Dostoevsky the use of violence and murder. The personality of man, any man, even the most miserable, like the filthy usurer of Crime and Punishment, is something sacred and absolute that it is wrong to use as a means or instrument, but you must respect and value as an end in itself . Both Raskolnikov Stavrogin
that have broken the current morality. But Raskolnikov believes he has discovered a theoretical truth and fight to win his freedom, even if illusory, is a researcher. Stavrogin rather not look for nothing, believes in nothing, has great intellectual ability but do not have a moral sense.
Through the characters of the two novels mentioned here, Dostoevsky wants to persuade us that the liberal world is a world weary, unable to see the consequences of its ideological positions.
"The character of 'demonic' is to push and trample the man against his will, depriving them of freedom and availability of interior, severing the bonds of human participation with others. This demonic that denies God, freedom and personality, mental illness is more than a political phenomenon. The "demonic" and "obsession" are forces that paralyze the personality, the sense of freedom and atrophy contract consciousness. " [1]
[1] Dostoevsky (1870), The demons, the introduction of Remo Cantoni, Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, Milan, 1987, pag.X.
0 comments:
Post a Comment